A shirt designed to carry a simple message written by Martin Richard, 8, who was killed in the recent Boston tragedy. Little brother showing of the shirt.
Jorge's Blog
Sunday, April 28, 2013
Monday, April 22, 2013
Screen Printing/Slingshot
Jorge Rosales
Art 301 Screen
Printing
April 22, 2013
I
think it was very interesting to see how screen-printing is a common use to
make propaganda. A lot of times we see shirts and poster which are screen
printed but we never stop to think on how they are done and how easy it is to
actually make a screen print. Kazoo’s talk about the power of art was also very
interesting because it goes to show how we must be conscience of what message
we are putting out into the public. Her example of the GAP creating a tee shirt
that had “Manifest Destiny” in big bold letters is a perfect example of artists
simply creating something in order to sell and not thoroughly thinking about
what message they are expressing. If you print a shirt with Manifest Destiny it
further reinforces that genocide of the natives was justified because the
Europeans that came here had “the right to expand westward”. Not only is it sponsoring
genocide but also violence and war such as the war against Mexico where many
losses occurred on both sides of the border. I think Slingshot is definitely one
of the most surprising organizations I have heard of because the way they
handle their business is very unique. It brings in the element of community all
the way across the board and to have a newspaper and planner each with
different artists and writers is something that can empower a community. I
think the way Slingshot approached their newspaper is something that many
organizations can replicate because a lot of the times we talk about
incorporating the community but it rarely gets so integrated and open as the
way Slingshot handles it.
Sunday, March 31, 2013
Taller Tupac Amaru
Jorge Rosales
March 31, 2013 Taller Tupac Amaru
ART 301
I
thought it was very interesting that USF chose to bring Taller Tupac Amaru to
the Thatcher gallery because they are on the more “radical” side of the art
world. They have beautiful work but in a setting like USF it was a bit of a
surprise. It is very inspirational work because it focuses all on creating a
better world or at least a more conscience world that we live in. My favorite
piece at the gallery was “Zapateado De Los Muertos” which is a woman in front
of a green background with a skull covering half her face and she is looking
down at her feet. This image seemed very mysterious and powerful because it was
a reminder to people that death is something that exists in our everyday lives.
I sat in front of this poster for at least thirty minutes contemplating what
the meaning was behind such an image. During the panel discussion
one of the artists said something very important. Favianna said that most of
the times we ask artists to make posters for us after we have our ideas set on
what it is we want. She told us that this is a huge mistake because we are
simply asking the artist to take action by helping us with an already
conceptualized idea. We must include the artist in the process of brainstorming
and coming up with ideas according to Favianna. I fully agree with her because
it is the truth, most of the time we use the artist for the labor and not the
input of ideals. She also stated something along the lines of how sometimes
artists think on a bigger almost impossible scale sometimes and how this can be
helpful because it begins a change in conscience in people who see their art
work. I think if the artist is included in the ideals of a movement instead of
just the process it creates a stronger piece of work where the artist is also
connected to the movement instead of printing/creating already set in place
ideals.
Sunday, March 24, 2013
Designing Pornotopia
Jorge Rosales
March 24 2013
Designing Pornotopia
ART 301
In
“Designing Pornotopia” we get a very important message which is that we need
not to only change the way design is used but change our own mindsets. In order
for design to change and how it is used we must first change our mindsets. If
we try to change design before changing out mindsets than the design work will
still be the same that we created before trying to create change.
An important aspect that comes up I think is when the author mentions the street
as a place where we already incorporate commercial in. This is important
because if we want to create change in the world it must begin with aspects of
community. You cannot just send out one broad message to the entire world
without taking into consideration how the space in their surroundings is set
up. The street is considered a public space yet often we see capital
advertisements surrounding it and us. I think that changing our mindset goes
along with changing our surroundings and taking ownership of that public space
and no longer allowing dangerous, capitalist propaganda to take over our public
space.
Monday, March 4, 2013
Week 3 response
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgEjFtmr4LrKzNJ80iduu4HhvcBuZfSzOxqAx873rbv5i5xuNF1HPB9UiNSzwJYqEuhhdpN_PkH5R0AAMQzZeExd7tXO3rmrWnWuSAYy8yBdqVHqyyEFNQBOQhYHwXHnwMHGWl0p6yXg_M/s1600/amnesty3.jpg)
The 2nd example of design and social change I think is fairly important is the floppy disk. Although not very artistic looking or beautiful, the floppy did function exactly the way it was supposed to. It was a small, portable way to carry information from computer to computer. It revolutionized the way we exchanged files and memory in our computers and giving way to a more portable form of media sharing that had not been available before its commercialization.
Sunday, February 24, 2013
Week 2 Response
Jorge Rosales
February 22 2013 Weekly Response 2
ART 301
Katherine
McCoy’s writing brings up a very important in her writing when she is speaking
about the “white lab coats” that many designers put on. She criticizes
designers for acting as if they are able to design things without fearing
consequences of how those used or what context they are put in. I have to agree
with her that we have to be conscience of our surroundings and the context in
which our work can be placed. Her point about how design has created self censorship
is also very important because it is the truth. We now have an idea of design
as something that should be made to be visually appealing and pleasant or to
sell something. When we see something deemed “radical” we shun it as being too
extreme as if political or thought provoking design were outside the limits of
our realm. In reality we must take this power of thought provoking visual art
and use it to create a better place here on this Earth. If we try to push
ourselves away from this political/thought provoking setting then it only means
that the truth is that our work, our design is always inside a certain
political/thought provoking realm. In “Obey The Giant” by Rick Poynor we are
given a final statement in which we are told, “that there are too many occasions
when it is confiscated, controlled, doctored, diluted and sold back to us with
its meanings changed for completely different purposes”. Rick is touching upon
the censorship that revolves around graphic design and how it has affected how
we see things. Sometimes our work is taken, modified and forced to fit other contexts
with both negative and positive consequences. These two articles touch upon
something that seems to be forgotten in the design world which is that we must
not be afraid to push the boundaries, on the contrary we must continue to push
them. For too long the design community has been satisfied with designing logo’s
for American consumers and not enough time trying to change the consumer
society in which design is restricted to only sell products.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)